Breadth of Good

I guess I’m a little slow on the uptake with this, but leave me alone, I’ve only been blogging for like a week. Anyway, the Governor General’s English-Language Poetry Award shortlists came out recently amid the usual October barrage of fiction nominees national and global, offering the five titles its trio of judges liked the best.

It’s a pretty good list, and an important one after last year’s simultaneous-breakdown-of-systemic-and-moral-norms. The GGs probably only had a year or two to get it right before fading into the shadow of the bigger, sexier, more privately-financed Griffin Award. Here’s the list the jury came up with:

I’m familiar with three of these things, and I liked all thre. I don’t know “Philip Kevin Paul” and originally thought they were three separate people (like “Peter, Paul, and Mary”). But apparently it’s one guy, a First-Nations poet from out west, and he’s pretty good. I haven’t read David Zieroth’s The Fly in Autumn, either. My only real surprise  was that Anansi’s trio of well-received books (by Solie, Langer, and Warner) went 0/3. Oh well, with the year they had last year, one can’t feel too bad.

The three that I know are they Queyras, the McFadden, and the Starnino. The jury should be applauded for showing love to poets with such an incredible breadth of styles. The same three people liked both Carmine and David’s work? This is impressive, and speaks to a group (namely Janice Kulyk Keefer, John Pass, and George Murray) that could balance their own tastes and preoccupations with those shared by the rest of the national poetry mob.

Before counting McFadden as the representative “anecdotal raconteur” on the list, we need to remember that “Be Calm, Honey” is a book of fairly stringent sonnets. Likewise, before classifying the Starnino as formalism’s entry into the five, we need to admit that it made the list in part because it’s much more warm-to-the-touch than the occasionally antiseptic collections that came before it.

Sina Queyras’ Expressway was a really great book, and exciting to me personally as it traveled many of the same roads (sorry, that’s my only pun for this week) that I’m doing now in my own work. It might be the favourite, but who knows what three people in a room are going to choose. As for my own favourite, it’s hard to say. I liked all three books I’ve read, but This Way Out likely stands as the biggest surprise, and perhaps the most memorable of the three because of that.

The thing to do now is to go read those other two selected titles. If it ever stops raining, I’ll make that my afternoon.

Explore posts in the same categories: Awards, Canadian Literature

3 Comments on “Breadth of Good”

  1. Robert Earl Stewart Says:

    I, too, was surprised Solie’s Pigeon was not listed. It’s fabulous. The only one I’ve read of the five nominees is the McFadden, and it is a deserving nominee.

  2. voxpopulism Says:

    Yeah, I feel as though I liked it less than “Modern & Normal”, but still enjoyed it. More than that though, didn’t it feel like it was “her turn” in some sort of generalized way. Not that these kind of global tastes matter to awards handed out by juries of just three people.

  3. I thought Solie’s book her best and, moreover, a step forward in that it seemed to be wearing less armour than her previous collections. Definitely worthy of being on the shortlist. The “her turn” thing should be completely irrelevant. It should be about who wrote the best book. One could also argue that it’s not McFadden’s turn, as he was shortlisted for the Griffin for his last book. Another book I’m surprised to see passed over is _Lisa Robertson’s Magenta Soul Whip_. It’s not my style, but I’d probably put it on a shortlist, unless there were some exceedingly strong competition. And I haven’t seen the Zieroth, the Queyras or the Paul books, so that may well be.

    But I don’t think the shortlist reveals anything like catholicism on the part of all jurors. The GG shortlist almost always contains widely divergent books. This reflects more the favourites of individual jurors than common ground. What common ground there is gets reflected in the winner. Which, let’s face it, could be two jurors’ fifth favourite book and the third juror’s tenth, if they can’t agree on anything else…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s